Talk:Tennis/Catalogs/Famous players: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Charles Sandberg (Define famous) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"Famous" works. However, it's still a ''catalog'' of them, per a dictionary def. :-) --[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:43, 13 June 2007 (CDT) | "Famous" works. However, it's still a ''catalog'' of them, per a dictionary def. :-) --[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:43, 13 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Define famous == | |||
What would you consider a famous tennis player? Would it include all professional players that are notable, or only players that were World No. 1 at one point in their life? --[[User:Charles Sandberg|Charles Sandberg]] 20:21, 2 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 2 July 2007
Check out Catalog_of_religions for I think a superior method than having just a list! Stephen Ewen 17:22, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- I gotta say I don't think I've ever heard of a "catalog" of human beings of any kind, although I suppose they do exist. "Catalog" make me think of Sears-Roebuck. But if you think this is a useful renaming, I have no objections. But I don't understand what more you think should then be done -- should each article about the individual tennis player then be put under the list of players in the "catalog"? It's possible, of course, but I don't see the utility of someone doing a "search" for Pancho Gonzales being sent via Redirect to that article under Catalog of prominent tennis players. By the way, is there a Catalog of presidents or Catalog of American presidents, just to find something similar? Hayford Peirce 18:16, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
"Famous" works. However, it's still a catalog of them, per a dictionary def. :-) --Stephen Ewen 04:43, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
Define famous
What would you consider a famous tennis player? Would it include all professional players that are notable, or only players that were World No. 1 at one point in their life? --Charles Sandberg 20:21, 2 July 2007 (CDT)