Talk:Gymnastics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(don't knock my old picture)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(start checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Gymnastics
|                cat1 = Sports
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 2
|        underlinked =
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 15:08, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
I just have to go now, but I will expand it. [[User:Jordan Goldberg|Jordan Goldberg]] 06:06, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
I just have to go now, but I will expand it. [[User:Jordan Goldberg|Jordan Goldberg]] 06:06, 11 June 2007 (CDT)



Revision as of 14:08, 11 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Gymnastics"
Workgroup category or categories Sports Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Not specified
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Matt Innis (Talk) 15:08, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






I just have to go now, but I will expand it. Jordan Goldberg 06:06, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

I need an example of combinations getting bonus points or tricks elevated in level. I added a section on vocabulary and tried to define "trick." I also added 2 helpful links. Tom Kelly 14:24, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

We do have a picture of Nadia --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:30, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

What is the resolution of that picture? Is there somewhere where that is listed? I don't actually know much about resolution and megapixels, etc. To say it bluntly, is the picture too blurry? Tom Kelly 14:38, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
It looks like it was enlarged from the original source. There's a fair amount of noise, some image resolution loss, a little bit of jpeg artifacting. It's usable but I wouldn't consider it "great".--Robert W King 14:44, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
Additionally I just saw that it comes from a collection of photos from the 1970s so it may be the best you can get unless you can get a scan from an original publication around that date. Otherwise, it's a digital duplication of the available photo technology at the time.--Robert W King 14:47, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
Okay, okay, but it's at least as good as this one ;-) I'll keep my Nadia picture then, hehe. --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT)