Talk:Democrat Party (phrase)/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
imported>Roger A. Lohmann No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Indeed; if you want to get in a mudfight in Washington just refer to the "Democrat party." The current 2008 GOP candidates are not using the term, I think.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 11:59, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ::Indeed; if you want to get in a mudfight in Washington just refer to the "Democrat party." The current 2008 GOP candidates are not using the term, I think.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 11:59, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ||
::Last time round the subtle attack line was 'John Kerry is a typical Massachussets ''Liberal''' (Emphasised) Don't know what they'll corner Obama on if he gets nominated - attacking a 'Liberal' when he is embracing and encouraging bipartisanship will simply make you look mean. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:04, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ::Last time round the subtle attack line was 'John Kerry is a typical Massachussets ''Liberal''' (Emphasised) Don't know what they'll corner Obama on if he gets nominated - attacking a 'Liberal' when he is embracing and encouraging bipartisanship will simply make you look mean. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:04, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ||
==Approval?== | |||
Whether any authors and editors at CZ approve or disapprove of this usage isn't really the point. The author(s) of this article appear to have been an excellent job summarizing the dynamics of the issue and as an editor in history and politics, I am ready to nominate it for approval. It would be good if someone from the media workgroup might choose to join me in recommending it. I want to take a look at the subpages, and then I'll give it a full week for approval to give everyone a chance to get in their objections and last edits. | |||
[[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] 22:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:54, 6 March 2009
I'm a liberal and don't reject the use of this term :-)
Though I'm not an American liberal, and from what I've read there is some differences in our American brethern. Denis Cavanagh 06:41, 7 January 2008 (CST)
- Indeed; if you want to get in a mudfight in Washington just refer to the "Democrat party." The current 2008 GOP candidates are not using the term, I think.Richard Jensen 11:59, 7 January 2008 (CST)
- Last time round the subtle attack line was 'John Kerry is a typical Massachussets Liberal' (Emphasised) Don't know what they'll corner Obama on if he gets nominated - attacking a 'Liberal' when he is embracing and encouraging bipartisanship will simply make you look mean. Denis Cavanagh 12:04, 7 January 2008 (CST)
Approval?
Whether any authors and editors at CZ approve or disapprove of this usage isn't really the point. The author(s) of this article appear to have been an excellent job summarizing the dynamics of the issue and as an editor in history and politics, I am ready to nominate it for approval. It would be good if someone from the media workgroup might choose to join me in recommending it. I want to take a look at the subpages, and then I'll give it a full week for approval to give everyone a chance to get in their objections and last edits. Roger Lohmann 22:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)