Talk:Harvard University: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎An historian vs. a historian: What does Google say about this?)
 
imported>Todd Coles
(check)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Harvard University
|                cat1 = Education
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 09:07, 29 August 2007 (CDT)
}}
==An historian vs. a historian==
==An historian vs. a historian==
Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better.  I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side.
Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better.  I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side.

Revision as of 08:07, 29 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Harvard University"
Workgroup category or categories Education Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Todd Coles 09:07, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





An historian vs. a historian

Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better. I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side.

I then did a Google for "an historian" and found 734,000 hits, an impressive number. Just to be impartial, however, I then Googled "a historian" and found 1,810,000 hits.

So I guess we'll leave it as "a historian." :( Hayford Peirce 11:39, 1 July 2007 (CDT)