Talk:Cost of debt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner (→Candidate for deletion?: new section) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Candidate for deletion?: blanking (not deleting)) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I am not convinced that this article is helpful. It seems likely to confuse rather than inform. But that may not be an acceptable reason for deletion. Any views? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 11:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | I am not convinced that this article is helpful. It seems likely to confuse rather than inform. But that may not be an acceptable reason for deletion. Any views? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 11:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I think you are right -- it does not really explain its topic. But (in order to save history) it is easier and enough to simply blank it and wait until someone writes a good article. It is an appropriate topic, I think. Thus I'll blank the page and remove the WP credit. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:07, 19 January 2010
Candidate for deletion?
I am not convinced that this article is helpful. It seems likely to confuse rather than inform. But that may not be an acceptable reason for deletion. Any views? Nick Gardner 11:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think you are right -- it does not really explain its topic. But (in order to save history) it is easier and enough to simply blank it and wait until someone writes a good article. It is an appropriate topic, I think. Thus I'll blank the page and remove the WP credit. --Peter Schmitt 01:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)