Talk:Van der Waals equation/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Kim van der Linde (→References: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure | However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure | ||
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT) | [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
== References == | |||
Leiden, 1873 is not informative, is there is full reference for it? [[User:Kim van der Linde|Kim van der Linde]] 16:27, 4 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:27, 4 October 2007
WP article is for 90% mine.--Paul Wormer 04:24, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
I changed a lot in the CZ version w.r.t the WP version (added a graph and removed a redundant equation), but forgot to switch off the WP flag. I dare now to give it status 1. --Paul Wormer 03:12, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
{{ToApprove}} However, there does appear to be an "n" missing in p V = RT in the text just below the isotherm figure David E. Volk 14:47, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
References
Leiden, 1873 is not informative, is there is full reference for it? Kim van der Linde 16:27, 4 October 2007 (CDT)