Terrorism/Approval: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
(New page: {{subpages}} {{Approval |url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Terrorism&direction=next&oldid=100130685 |now = 22:05, 6 July 2007 (CDT) |editor=Richard Jensen |editor2= |editor3= |ed...)
 
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Approval
{{Approval
|url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Terrorism&direction=next&oldid=100130685
|   article url =http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Terrorism&direction=next&oldid=100130685
|now = 22:05, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
|   subpage url =
|editor=Richard Jensen
|        cluster =
|editor2=
|            now =22:05, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
|editor3=
|     ToA editor = Richard Jensen
|editor4=
|   ToA editor2 =
|group=Military
|   ToA editor3 =
|group2=Politics
|           date =20070706
|group3=
|date =20070706
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 21:19, 16 November 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
Return to the current talk page for the article Terrorism
Richard Jensen nominated the version dated 22:05, 6 July 2007 (CDT) of this article for approval. An unknown workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, 20070706.


This artcle is first nominated version 100127060 for approval by Politics editor Richard Jensen using the individual approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:48, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

In short, we must find a terrorism expert to approve this article. My apologies, again. --Larry Sanger 11:19, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

As per my own earllier suggestion on Richard Jensen's Talk page, I have written to Professor Michael Nacht at UC Berkeley, asking him if he would be willing to have a look at this article. If, by extraordinary good fortune, he is willing to comment on it, I will forward his comments and post them here. If we are even more lucky, perhaps he would consider joining us as an editor. It's a long shot, but I thought it worth a try, as this seems a strong entry in an important area; should we be favored with any comments, positive or negative, I'm sure they would be of great value. Russell Potter 17:14, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

I agree that the comments would be welcome, but I've received sufficient evidence of Richard Jensen's own expertise on the topic. --Larry Sanger 18:59, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

This article is approved under the individual editor rules for the version number 100130685 with the approving editor Richard Jensen for the Military and History workgroups. --Matt Innis (Talk) 22:17, 6 July 2007 (CDT)