Talk:Eggnog: Difference between revisions
imported>Aleta Curry (Oh, if my grandmother could see this!) |
imported>Aleta Curry (→There oughta be a law...!: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::My word it was! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 20:28, 8 December 2007 (CST) | ::My word it was! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 20:28, 8 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::Okay, I shouldn't fuss (but you know me)--eggnog should be served from a punchbowl into little glass cups. And...is that ''ice''? OMG!!! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 20:32, 8 December 2007 (CST) | ::Okay, I shouldn't fuss (but you know me)--eggnog should be served from a punchbowl into little glass cups. And...is that ''ice''? OMG!!! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 20:32, 8 December 2007 (CST) | ||
== There oughta be a law...! == | |||
I am viewing the packaging of a commercial product named "Egg Nog". I present it for your reding and gastronomic pleasure: Reduced Fat Milk (94%) (1.6% Milkfat), Sugar [to me, that implies "sucrose"; given the taste, I find that claim suspect], Whole Egg (1%) [No, you read that right--ONE PERCENT] flavours [one of which is probably aspertame, the other artifical vanilla], stabiliser (407,452), (we can only hope that's safe for human consumption] colour (160a) [ditto on the hope]. For some reason, "sodium" makes it onto the "nutrition information", but it's not listed as an ingredient. Hmmm.... | |||
It should be illegal for anything which is 1% egg to be called egg nog. | |||
Further, this is unpalatable. I would describe the taste, but this is a family show. | |||
Utterly disgusting.</rant> | |||
[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 17:01, 18 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 18 December 2007
Ha!
ROFL. Way to go, Aleta. Yes we need an article on Eggnog. By the way, we have a joke around my house about the recipe for eggnog. One egg and one nog, blended. :D Stephen Ewen 03:00, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Photos
I've got licensing requests out for some professional quality photos for this article. Stephen Ewen 18:46, 8 December 2007 (CST)
- That was quick! Stephen Ewen 19:08, 8 December 2007 (CST)
- My word it was! Aleta Curry 20:28, 8 December 2007 (CST)
- Okay, I shouldn't fuss (but you know me)--eggnog should be served from a punchbowl into little glass cups. And...is that ice? OMG!!! Aleta Curry 20:32, 8 December 2007 (CST)
There oughta be a law...!
I am viewing the packaging of a commercial product named "Egg Nog". I present it for your reding and gastronomic pleasure: Reduced Fat Milk (94%) (1.6% Milkfat), Sugar [to me, that implies "sucrose"; given the taste, I find that claim suspect], Whole Egg (1%) [No, you read that right--ONE PERCENT] flavours [one of which is probably aspertame, the other artifical vanilla], stabiliser (407,452), (we can only hope that's safe for human consumption] colour (160a) [ditto on the hope]. For some reason, "sodium" makes it onto the "nutrition information", but it's not listed as an ingredient. Hmmm....
It should be illegal for anything which is 1% egg to be called egg nog. Further, this is unpalatable. I would describe the taste, but this is a family show. Utterly disgusting.</rant> Aleta Curry 17:01, 18 December 2007 (CST)