Category of functors: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
No edit summary
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
({{subpages}})
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
This article focuses on the category of contravariant functors between two categories.  
This article focuses on the category of contravariant functors between two categories.  



Revision as of 16:23, 18 December 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

This article focuses on the category of contravariant functors between two categories.

The category of functors

Let and be two categories. The category of functors has

  1. Objects are functors
  2. A morphism of functors is a natural transformations ; i.e., for each object of , a morphism in such that for all morphisms in , the diagram

commutes.

A natural isomorphism is a natural tranformation such that is an isomorphism in for every object . One can verify that natural isomorphisms are indeed isomorphisms in the category of functors.

Examples

  1. In the theory of schemes, the presheaves are often referred to as the functor of points of the scheme X. Yoneda's lemma allows one to think of a scheme as a functor in some sense, which becomes a powerful interpretation; indeed, meaningful geometric concepts manifest themselves naturally in this language, including (for example) functorial characterizations of smooth morphisms of schemes.

The Yoneda lemma

Let be a category and let be objects of . Then

  1. If is any contravariant functor , then the natural transformations of to are in correspondence with the elements of the set .
  2. If the functors and are isomorphic, then and are isomorphic in . More generally, the functor , , is an equivalence of categories between and the full subcategory of representable functors in .

References