The Four Noble Truths: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk m (remove excess category tags-now in metadata page) |
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''The Four Noble Truths''' are | '''The Four Noble Truths''' are an important concept in [[Buddhism]]. Scholars have published a variety of different statements about what they are and their place in Buddhism. | ||
==Translation== | |||
Some scholars present them as statements, propositions, about suffereing and so on (see below). Others, however, say that they are actually not statements but the things themselves, suffering etc. Some of these suggest "Realities" as a translation. Some scholars seem to mix the two interpretations, suggesting they may regard both as valid aspects. | |||
:# | |||
In addition, a variety of possible analyses of the compounds in ancient Indian languages have been put forward: | |||
#noble truths | |||
#truths of the noble one, i.e. the Buddha | |||
#truths of the noble ones, i.e. those who have attained some level of enlightenment | |||
#ennobling truths | |||
K.R. Norman (then President of the Pali Text Society) suggested all meanings were valid, saying multiple meanings were common in the Indian tradition. | |||
==Role== | |||
The received wisdom among American and European scholars, though contested, is that they are the central teachings of all or most traditions of [[Buddhism]].<ref>''History of Religions'', volume 42, page 389 </ref> | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{Reflist}} |
Revision as of 11:26, 7 June 2012
The Four Noble Truths are an important concept in Buddhism. Scholars have published a variety of different statements about what they are and their place in Buddhism.
Translation
Some scholars present them as statements, propositions, about suffereing and so on (see below). Others, however, say that they are actually not statements but the things themselves, suffering etc. Some of these suggest "Realities" as a translation. Some scholars seem to mix the two interpretations, suggesting they may regard both as valid aspects.
In addition, a variety of possible analyses of the compounds in ancient Indian languages have been put forward:
- noble truths
- truths of the noble one, i.e. the Buddha
- truths of the noble ones, i.e. those who have attained some level of enlightenment
- ennobling truths
K.R. Norman (then President of the Pali Text Society) suggested all meanings were valid, saying multiple meanings were common in the Indian tradition.
Role
The received wisdom among American and European scholars, though contested, is that they are the central teachings of all or most traditions of Buddhism.[1]
Notes
- ↑ History of Religions, volume 42, page 389