CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 50: Line 50:
==Enable external feedback==
==Enable external feedback==


{{proposal
Proposal moved to the [[CZ:Proposals/Approval and Feedback|Approval and Feedback]] group.
|Brief descriptive title = Enable external feedback
|Summary of proposal = Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit.
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
|Username of driver = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]]
|Next step = Ensure proposal page summarizes community views
|Target date for next step = Feb 20
|Notes =
}}


==Article Content Request help==
==Article Content Request help==

Revision as of 15:41, 13 February 2008

Instructions

To start a new proposal or issue, please give us six short pieces of information:

  1. Brief descriptive title. The exact same title you used on this page. Note, this goes in the == Heading ==, too.
  2. Summary of proposal. Limited to 100 words.
  3. Name and date of original proposer: write four tildes ~~~~
  4. Username of driver. If you, write three tildes ~~~; if someone else, specify. This is the person who makes sure the proposal moves along from step to step in its development. If the "driver" is left blank, and no one volunteers to be driver, your proposal may be moved to the "discarded" queue. The driver should get familiar with the proposals system policy page.
  5. Next step. The next thing you need to do to move the proposal toward reality. Not sure what to write? Hints here.
  6. Target date for next step. A date the driver commits to, for completing the next step. If you drop the ball, the proposal may become driverless.
  7. (Optional) Notes. Brief salient remarks. Bear in mind the bulk of the info about the proposal doesn't go here but on the (much bigger) proposal page. A handy link to the proposal page will pop up after you save the template.

Put this information in this blank template:

== Brief descriptive title ==
{{proposal
|Brief descriptive title = 
|Summary of proposal =
|Name and date of original proposer = 
|Username of driver = 
|Next step = 
|Target date for next step = 
|Notes =  
}}

Simply copy and paste that at the bottom of this page, fill it out, and save. Then you've finished creating your new proposal/issue!

Optional next step for proposers. This is optional, and you can leave it to the driver. Follow the "complete proposal" link you'll find at the bottom of your new proposal box. On that page, you can elaborate the proposal or issue, link to pre-existing discussions, and generally say whatever you think needs to be said in order to get the proposal adopted (or the issue decided) and implemented. That's generally where to follow the progress of your proposal. (Guidelines are available.)

New proposals

Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages

Moved to CZ:Proposals/Editorial Council.

Should history articles be named with general terms first?

Summary: Should general article names be written as France, history as preferred to History of France or French History? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g France, history) should be called History of France or even French history. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for France in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:

etc.

Original proposer: Denis Cavanagh 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Fill in next step
Driver: Driver needed (i.e., someone familiar with the proposals system who will move it through the system) To be done by: Fill in target date for next step
Notes: This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.Denis Cavanagh 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST)
Complete proposal


Enable external feedback

Proposal moved to the Approval and Feedback group.

Article Content Request help

Summary: Article Content Request should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is not intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline.
Original proposer: --Robert W King 14:09, 11 February 2008 (CST) Next step: This should be in the username of driver field.
Driver: Some User To be done by: Near future
Notes: Theoretical page located at CZ:ACR using template:request.
Complete proposal


How should we classify and index recipes?

Summary: A new subpage type should be created CZ:Recipes. Anyone interested may take the lead in creating CZ:Recipes and then the Recipe subpage support should be added to the subpage system. The subpage may be bilaterally linked with the Cooking page.
Original proposer: Hayford Peirce 16:50, 12 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Discussion and a firm decision after consensus is reached
Driver: Supten Sarbadhikari To be done by: February 20, 2008.
Notes: What should we do about listing, and/or cataloging, and/or indexing the recipes that I am beginning to put into various preexisting articles. Various people discussed this in the talk page of Bolognese sauce but nothing concrete appears to have come of that discussion. Even without any definitive policy being put into place in the near future, I will continue to add recipes to various articles. I imagine that it will not be difficult to catalog, or subpage them, or whatever, when the time comes. Hayford Peirce
Complete proposal



Change to reversion policy

Moved to CZ:Proposals/Constabulary.

Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):