Talk:Official English movement: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
m (Talk:English Only moved to Talk:Official English movement: Avoiding neutrality problem (see Talk))
imported>John Stephenson
(changed name to 'official English movement' - though this is not exactly neutral either)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term.  Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given.  The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term.  Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given.  The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
:OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 02:25, 10 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Campaigns in the USA which call for English to be made the only official language of the country; a common name for this is 'English Only', often used by civil liberties groups to describe the debate, but supporters usually prefer 'pro-English' or 'official English'. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Linguistics, Education and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a different term. Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our Neutrality Policy could be given. The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --Larry Sanger 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)

OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. John Stephenson 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT)