Talk:Official English movement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson m (Talk:English Only moved to Talk:Official English movement: Avoiding neutrality problem (see Talk)) |
imported>John Stephenson (changed name to 'official English movement' - though this is not exactly neutral either) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term. Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given. The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT) | I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term. Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given. The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
:OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:25, 10 June 2008
I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a different term. Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our Neutrality Policy could be given. The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --Larry Sanger 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
- OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. John Stephenson 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Education Developing Articles
- Education Nonstub Articles
- Education Internal Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles