Talk:Parts-per notation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
m (Talk:"Parts-per" notation moved to Talk:Parts-per notation: To remove quotation characters)
imported>Olier Raby
(/* == Section out of place ? ==)
Line 4: Line 4:


I was not a contributor to the WP article. This article was written and formatted from scratch. It has some content from the WP article and it is much shorter because I thought that the WP article was much too wordy, got into too much detail and went off on some unneeded tangents. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:43, 9 August 2008 (CDT)
I was not a contributor to the WP article. This article was written and formatted from scratch. It has some content from the WP article and it is much shorter because I thought that the WP article was much too wordy, got into too much detail and went off on some unneeded tangents. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:43, 9 August 2008 (CDT)
== Section out of place ? ==
The ''Summary of large number names'' section seems out of place, since the article presents ppm, ppb and ppt. Should we keep it? [[User:Olier Raby|Olier Raby]] 22:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:43, 14 October 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Notation used in science and engineering, to denote dimensionless proportionalities in measured quantities such as proportions at the parts-per-million (ppm), parts-per-billion (ppb), and parts-per-trillion (ppt) level. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics, Chemistry and Engineering [Categories OK]
 Subgroup categories:  Chemical Engineering and Environmental Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

There is a Wikipedia article of the same name

I was not a contributor to the WP article. This article was written and formatted from scratch. It has some content from the WP article and it is much shorter because I thought that the WP article was much too wordy, got into too much detail and went off on some unneeded tangents. Milton Beychok 22:43, 9 August 2008 (CDT)

Section out of place ?

The Summary of large number names section seems out of place, since the article presents ppm, ppb and ppt. Should we keep it? Olier Raby 22:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Parts-per_notation&oldid=519023"