Discount rate/Tutorials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5. | Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5. | ||
<ref>[http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1995_01.pdf David Pearce and David Ulph: '' A Social Time Discount Rate for the United Kingdom'', GSERGE Working Paper No GEC95.01, 1995]</ref>. | <ref>[http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1995_01.pdf David Pearce and David Ulph: '' A Social Time Discount Rate for the United Kingdom'', GSERGE Working Paper No GEC95.01, 1995]</ref>. | ||
==The intergeneration transfer controversy== | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 12:28, 26 August 2008
The present value of future costs and benefits
The present value V of a cost (or benefit) occuring after an interval of t years at a dicount rate of r is given by:
The net present expected value of a future cost (or benefit) that has z possible values is given by calculating the value of in the above equation as:
where is the probability of occurrence of the value
The present value of a series of annual costs and benefits, ocurring after annual intervals 0 to n is given by:
- .
The social time preference rate
The social time preference rate, s, is given by:-
- s = δ + ηg
where:
- δ is the pure time preference rate (otherwise known as the utility discount rate);
- η is the elasticity of marginal utility with respect to consumption; and,
- g is the expected future growth rate of consumption.
Evidence based upon the structure of personal income tax rates in OECD countries suggests that the value of η for most developed countries is close to 1.4 [1].
Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5.
[2].