Satanic ritual abuse: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 32: Line 32:
However, Kent has stated that he believes that intergenerational satanic accounts are plausible and rituals may come from a deviant interpretation of religious texts.<ref>Kent S (1993). “Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse part one: possible Judeo-Christian influences ''Religion'' 23:229-241</ref><ref>Kent S (1993) Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse. II: possible Masonic, Mormon, Magick, and Pagan influences ''Religion'' 23:355-367</ref>   
However, Kent has stated that he believes that intergenerational satanic accounts are plausible and rituals may come from a deviant interpretation of religious texts.<ref>Kent S (1993). “Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse part one: possible Judeo-Christian influences ''Religion'' 23:229-241</ref><ref>Kent S (1993) Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse. II: possible Masonic, Mormon, Magick, and Pagan influences ''Religion'' 23:355-367</ref>   


Another view of the deviant interpretation of religious text, as well as some Satanist symbolism as a conscious counterculture, is present in the overt  "Church of Satan"<ref>http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html Church of Satan</ref> formed in 1966 by Anton LaVey. Lewis traces LaVey's work as based on both countering Abrahamic religion as well as adapting non-Satanic occultists such as Crowley. <ref>{{citation
Another view of the deviant interpretation of religious text, as well as some Satanist symbolism as a conscious counterculture, is present in the overt  "Church of Satan"<ref>http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html Church of Satan</ref> formed in 1966 by Anton LaVey. Lewis traces LaVey's work as based on both countering Abrahamic religion as well as adapting non-Satanic occultists such as [[Aleister Crowley]]. <ref>{{citation
  | title = Diabolical Authority:Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition"  
  | title = Diabolical Authority:Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition"  
  | author = James R. Lewis | journal = Marburg Journal of Religion
  | author = James R. Lewis | journal = Marburg Journal of Religion

Revision as of 13:40, 7 April 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Template:TOC-right

Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) is a phrase coined in the 1980s to refer to well-publicized accounts of extreme child abuse allegedly organized by a satanic cult in the USA. Most of these claims about SRA assert that there are secret, criminal organizations motivated by worship of Satan, which commit ritual torture and sexual abuse of children to "program" them into the ideology of Satan worship. Some claims assert the existence of an international conspiratorial network. Less extreme versions assert that the secret networks consist of intergenerational family clans. [1] Most mainstream authorities doubt the credibility of these claims.

Some writers consider the terms ritual abuse, sadistic ritual abuse, and organized sadistic abuse to be virtually interchangeable but others do not; see Changing terminology below. This article addresses abuse that has a specific association with Satanic belief or symbols, and refers readers to articles on other forms of abuse that do not involve Satanic belief or symbols.

Michelle Remembers and the origins of a "moral panic"

There is no dispute that some psychotic murderers have called themselves Satanists, or that there have been some people who sexually abuse children, using rituals and perhaps references to the Devil to manipulate them. There are also some "pseudo-satanic" juvenile delinquents. However, in the late 1980s, widespread media accounts portrayed Satanism as a worldwide conspiracy behind such crimes as child sexual abuse, ritual murder, and cattle mutilation [2], precipitating what has been called a "moral panic". [3]

These claims started to appear rather suddenly; the first "survivor" account was published in 1980 in the best selling book, Michelle Remembers, after which accusations and rumors spread rapidly in the USA during the early 1980s and then declined again during the early 1990s.[4] Michelle Remembers was originally published as a factual account of her life; the book stated that "the source material was scrutinized" and that "Satanism has apparently existed there for many years"[5] Several subsequent investigations by journalists concluded that her accounts were fictional[6], although apparently they are still believed by some recovered memory therapists [7]

Soon after its publication, there were two highly publicized cases in California, one about a "sex ring" in Kern County, and then the Martin Preschool case.

Therapists in the 1980s reported a flood of accounts of cases of multiple personality disorder in which the person had memories of involvement in a destructive Satanic cult[8] [9] but objective validation of these memories was seldom forthcoming, and in several cases collateral history proved that the claims of ritual abuse were false. [10] Some have blamed irresponsible journalistic coverage of issues relating to child abuse for spreading unfounded fears [11]

No law enforcement agency or research study has found the kind of physical evidence needed to support accounts of SRA. In 1994, the National Criminal Justice Reference Service of the UK estimated that 242 cases of organized abuse occur each year in the UK, of which about 21 involve allegations of ritual or satanic abuse. Thus, organized abuse accounts for only a small minority of all cases handled by child protection teams. However, no evidence was found that the sexual and physical abuse of children was part of rites directed to a magical or religious objective. In the three substantiated cases of ritual, not satanic, abuse, the ritual was secondary to the sexual abuse. [12]

In 1990 the state of Utah set up a task force to report on ritual abuse. The report, published in 1992, noted that an opinion poll had found that 90 percent of Utah citizens believed that ritualistic sex abuse was occurring and that 68 percent supported more money being spent on investigating it. The report conceded that hard evidence was scarce, explaining that survivors reported that such groups were extremely careful and highly skilled at destroying evidence of their crimes. What we do have, said the report, is the evidence reported by the victims. That purported evidence also included the book Michelle Remembers, which was cited in the bibliography as fact [13].

The report also stated that there had been "successful prosecution of child abuse which contain indisputable elements of ritual abuse." This was contradicted by Kenneth V. Lanning, Supervisory Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation who detailed the consistent lack of evidence supporting these allegations in the USA.[14] Lanning has been criticized, in the book Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America, for not investigating the majority of the cases he has consulted on, some of which had convictions.[15]

False accusations in the midst of panic

Throughout the 1980s in the UK, some social workers came to believe child sex abuse was common, and that it could explain children's behavioural disorders. Several high profile cases of alleged ritual abuse were brought to courts, but the cases collapsed accompanied by trenchant criticism of police and social workers' willingness to believe allegations unsupported by solid evidence [16] The last high profile case was in 1991, when five boys and four girls, aged between eight and 15, were taken from their homes on South Ronaldsay, one of the Orkney Islands off the North West coast of Scotland. The children were taken by police and social workers in a dawn raid on February 1991, and taken to foster parents. The raid was organised after social workers questioned members of another family, whose father had been jailed for sexual abuse; this questioning led them to suspect there was a child sex ring and ritual abuse taking place. The children denied that any abuse had occurred (and were continuing to deny it fifteen years later[17]), but their denials were not believed by the social workers. The local community organised a public meeting to demand the return of the children to their homes; after two months, Sheriff David Kelbie ordered the children be returned, as there was no evidence against their parents. He said that the handling of the case by social workers had been fundamentally flawed and that the children had been subjected to cross-examinations designed to make them admit to being abused.[18]

Reviewing the rise and fall of the Satanic ritual abuse panic, University of New Hampshire historian David Frankfurter in his award-winning book Evil Incarnate: Rumors of Demonic Conspiracy and Satanic Abuse in History, argued that demonic conspiracies and satanic ritual abuse are simply myths of evil conspiracies that provide societies an excuse for bullying those who are already considered suspect; he also argued that those seeking to purge demonic conspiracies have done more violence than the devotees of those so-called evil groups.[19]

However, Kent has stated that he believes that intergenerational satanic accounts are plausible and rituals may come from a deviant interpretation of religious texts.[20][21]

Another view of the deviant interpretation of religious text, as well as some Satanist symbolism as a conscious counterculture, is present in the overt "Church of Satan"[22] formed in 1966 by Anton LaVey. Lewis traces LaVey's work as based on both countering Abrahamic religion as well as adapting non-Satanic occultists such as Aleister Crowley. [23] Lewis' analysis, however, does not suggest a long intergenerational tradition.

Belief in widespread ritual abuse

Although campaign groups for victims of abuse claim that there is some objective evidence of satanic ritual abuse to support the extensive accounts of alleged survivors, most academic commentators have concluded that the evidence for a vast Satanist conspiracy or extensive networks of "ritual abuse" practitioners is at best flimsy. Indeed, while there are certainly cases where psychotic abusers have used Satanic symbols, there is dispute as to whether there have been any cases in which Satanic belief systems have contributed to any actual abuse. [24] The issue is hard to resolve objectively because of major difficulties in diagnosis - behaviors that may be mistaken for ritual abuse include repetitive psychopathological abuse, sexual abuse by pedophiles, child pornography portraying ritual abuse, distorted memory, false memory, false report due to a severe mental disorder, pseudologia phantastica, adolescent behavior simulating ritual abuse, epidemic hysteria, deliberate lying, and hoaxes.[25]Children who have experienced extreme abuse develop coping strategies that include anxiety, denial, self-hypnosis, dissociation, and self-mutilation, and nurses who care for such children recognize that some of their reports must be discounted as false memories because they emerge from fantasy, distortions, innocent deceptions, false beliefs, lies, or adult coaching.[26]

Doubting the literal truth of the testimony of alleged victims of abuse does not imply any deliberate deception. When people claim to recall past-life experiences, or UFO alien contact and abduction, as a great many people have done, it is generally believed that these people have fantasized these entire complex scenarios and later defined them as memories of actual events rather than as imaginings. Such fantasy events can be elicited under hypnotic procedures and structured interviews which provide strong, repeated demands for the requisite experiences, and which then legitimate the experiences as "real memories." Skeptics of SRA allegations suspect that the evidence of alleged victims often involves similar false memories [27] It has been suggested that false memories of SRA are particularly likely in disturbed patients who either are Christian fundamentalists or who have therapists who are, and who believe in a literal Satan, at a time when the popular media abound with such stories of satanic abuse.[28]

In 1996, a survey of clinical members of the American Psychological Association showed that only a minority of clinical psychologists had encountered ritual cases. Of those that had encountered such cases, the majority believed their clients' claims, although the evidence for the allegations, especially in cases reported by adults claiming to have suffered the abuse during childhood, was questionable. [29] Most experts have concluded that many, if not most, of the memories of child sexual abuse recovered in adulthood are not a true reflection of history [30] Nevertheless, some psychotherapists believe that there must be at least tens of thousands of survivors of ritual abuse in the U.S.A. Valerie Sinason a psychotherapist and founder of the Clinic for Dissociative Studies in the UK is one who believes her clients: "the crimes I'm talking about are cannibalism, induced abortions for the purpose of murder and cannibalism, necrophilia, bestiality, anal, vaginal and oral abuse, and murder. Those crimes are in addition to the severe kinds of grievous bodily harm and everything else that people know about: eating shit, drinking blood, drinking urine, they make people feel sick, eating spiders, being put in coffins for long hours with spiders and snakes. They are all things that stir up archetypes, which is why they are used, of course. Those kind of crimes are pretty unbearable ones to hear about. You are hearing about those all the time."[31] [32]

Changing terminology

While the reports of the 1980s used the term "Satanic", some have suggested that it is inaccurate or overly dramatic and have preferred to use the terms "ritual abuse", "sadistic abuse", and "sexual abuse". Unquestionably, sadism, which is not specific to child abuse or even nonconsensuality, is a well-recognized term, deriving from the Marquis de Sade. The other terms, while not precisely defined, are commonly used in broader anthropological contexts.

The Report of the Ritual Abuse Task Force from the Los Angeles County Commission for Women, defined ritual abuse as "a brutal form of abuse of children, adolescents, and adults, consisting of physical, sexual, and psychological abuse, and involving the use of rituals. Ritual does not necessarily mean satanic. However, most survivors state that they were ritually abused as part of satanic worship for the purpose of indoctrinating them into satanic beliefs and practices." [33]

The term "cult" may also appear in this context. Not all cults are Satanic, and not all sadism is ritualistic or even a group activity. Whether or not a given ritual is abusive is also dependent on context: eating pork is commonplace to billions of people, while forcing a devout Muslim or Jew to eat pork would be abusive. Some cultures believe male circumcision or female genital mutilation are quite appropriate, and neither Christianity or Satanism may have anything to do with their beliefs.

Even some of the other terms pose particular difficulties for law enforcement. Ritual with a child is not necessarily abusive; rites of passage such as First Communions, Bar Mitzvahs, and other coming-of-age ceremonies are ritual by definition.

Some authors, notably Jean M. Goodwin, suggested the substitution of "sadistic" for "satanic" in the ongoing legal process.[34] In the book Satan's Silence, Nathan and Snedeker state Goodwin said that the change would (their quote) "reinforce adults' and childens' claims for various reasons.[35] For one, while talking about satanic ritual abuse posited behavior that criminologists and the public had never heard of, the term sadist recurred to real historical precedents: Caligula, the Spanish Inquisition, Jack the Ripper, John Gacey." They also wrote she began to include the criminology of serial killers, but pointed out several differences between the general patterns of serial killers and the cases under discussion:

  • Serial killers usually murder their victims quickly [with notable exceptions]— they do not allow them to leave and return over prolonged periods
  • "Unlike the gangs of perpetrators in ritual abuse stories, criminal sadists are usually loners. Occasionally, they recruit a partner, and sociopathic authoritarians such as Charles Manson sometimes direct several people"
  • Criminal sexual sadists have been men, rather than the women frequently accused of satanic ritual abuse.

Gould, whose paper on ritual abuse said "The evidence is rapidly accumulating that the problem of ritual abuse is considerable in scope and extremely grave in its consequences," only addressed Satanism with the comment "While ritual abuse is certainly an integral part of some kinds of Satanism, it is most likely that the deeper reason for the prevalence of ritual abuse is that, simply put, it reliably creates a group of people who function as unpaid slaves to the perpetrator group."[36]

References

  1. Victor JS (1998)Moral panics and the social construction of deviant behavior: a theory and application to the case of ritual child abuse. Sociological Perspectives Fall/1998
  2. Ellis W (2000) Raising the devil: Satanism, new religions, and the media‎ University Press of Kentucky 332 pages ISBN-10: 0813121701Reviewed in J Amer Folklore 117.463 (2004) 115-7
  3. deYoung M, Sociological views on the controversial issue of Satanic ritual abuse: three faces of the Devil, American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress
  4. Victor JS (1998)The Satanic Cult scare and allegations of ritual child abuse Sociological Perspectives 41:541-65
  5. Smith, Michelle. Michelle Remembers. New York: Pocket. ISBN 0671694332. 
  6. Michelle Remembers: The Debunking of a Myth Mail on Sunday September 1990
  7. Wenegrat B (2002) Theater of Disorder: Patients, Doctors, and the Construction of Illness Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195140877 P189 Reviewed in the BMJ
  8. Mulhern S (1994) Satanism, ritual abuse, and multiple personality disorder: a sociohistorical perspective.Int J Clin Exp Hypn 42:265-88. PMID 7960286
  9. Young WC (1993) Sadistic ritual abuse. An overview in detection and management. Prim Care 20:447-58. PMID 8356163
  10. Ross CA (1995), Satanic ritual abuse: Principles of treatment, University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0802073573
  11. Bottoms BL, Davis SL (1997) The creation of satanic ritual abuse J Social Clinical Psychol 16:111-228
  12. La Fontaine JS (1994) Extent and Nature of Organised and Ritual Abuse National Criminal Justice Reference Service (survey)ISBN 0-11-321797-8
  13. Report of Utah State Task Force on Ritual Abuse - Utah Governor’s Commission for Women and Families (1992)
  14. Lanning KV (1992), Satanic Ritual Abuse: a 1992 FBI Report
  15. Randall, J; Perskin PS (2000). Cult and Ritual Abuse: Its History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America. Greenwood Publishing Group, p229. ISBN 027596664X. 
  16. A full stop to the Satanic panic spiked
  17. Orkney abuse children speak out BBC22 August 2006
  18. la Fontaine JS (1998) Speak of the Devil: Tales of Satanic Abuse in Contemporary England Cambridge University Press ISBN: 0521629349 See p5 Reviewed in The New Statesman
  19. Frankfurter D (2006)Evil Incarnate: Rumors of Demonic Conspiracy and Satanic Abuse in History Princeton University Press ISBN13: 978-0-691-11350-0 of the 2007 Award of Excellence in the Study of Religion, Analytical-Descriptive Studies category, American Academy of Religion) reviewed here. herehere here
  20. Kent S (1993). “Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse part one: possible Judeo-Christian influences Religion 23:229-241
  21. Kent S (1993) Deviant Scripturalism and Ritual Satanic abuse. II: possible Masonic, Mormon, Magick, and Pagan influences Religion 23:355-367
  22. http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html Church of Satan
  23. James R. Lewis (September 2002), "Diabolical Authority:Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition"", Marburg Journal of Religion 7 (1)
  24. Victor JS (1993) Satanic Panic: the Creation of a Contemporary Legend‎ - Open Court Publishing Company ISBN-10: 081269192X Reviewed in Sociology of Religion 1994
  25. Bernet W, Chang DK (1997) The differential diagnosis of ritual abuse allegations. J Forensic Sci 42:32-8 PMID 8988572
  26. Valente S (2000) Controversies and challenges of ritual abuse. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 38:8-17 PMID 11105292
  27. Spanos NP et al. (1994) Past-life identities, UFO abductions, and satanic ritual abuse: the social construction of memories Int J Clin Exp Hypn 42:433-46 PMID 7960296
  28. Coons PM (1997) Distinguishing between Pseudomemories and Repression of Traumatic Events Psychological Inquiry 8:293-5
  29. Bottoms BL et al. (1996)An analysis of ritualistic and religion-related child abuse allegations Law and Human Behavior 20:1-34]
  30. e.g. Goodyear-Smith FA et al. (1998) Parents and other relatives accused of sexual abuse on the basis of recovered memories: a New Zealand family survey. N Z Med J 111:225-8. PMID 9695750
  31. Valerie Sinason Talks to Graeme Galton Article in journal “free associations”, Vol 10, part 4, No 56, Autumn 2003,
  32. Sinason (1994). Treating Survivors of Satanist Abuse. Routledge, 320. ISBN 0-415-10543-9. 
  33. http://www.geocities.com/kidhistory/ra.htm Report of the Ritual Abuse Task Force - Los Angeles County Commission for Women
  34. Goodwin GM (1991), "Human Vectors of Trauma: Illustrations from the Marquis de Sade, Rediscovering Childhood Trauma: Historical Casebook and Clinical Applications, American Psychiatric Press, pp. 95-111
  35. Nathan D, Snedeker M (1995), Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt, Basic Books. ISBN: 0465071813 , p. 241
  36. Gould, C (1995). "Denying ritual abuse of children". J Psychohist 22: 328-29.