Talk:Lewis Carroll: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (unfortunately, I have to agree) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Far, far beyond Fair Use: new section) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | : Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Far, far beyond Fair Use == | |||
I am appalled by this article. Evidently Meg Ireland brought it in 100% with no attempt to give it attribution or even make a *pass* at calling it "Fair Use". There is no indication anywhere in the article or on the Talk page that she herself did not write it in its entirety. As far as I'm concerned it's out and out plagiarism. Unless someone give me *very* strong counterarguments, I will be deleting it entirely. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 00:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:24, 27 April 2010
How much of the "slender and handsome in a soft-focused dreamy sort of way" text is copied from Karoline Leach? And can we get her to contribute her text to us under GPL? [1] --Ed Poor 13:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Biography compiled by the webmaster © carrollmyth.com/lewiscarroll.cc
NB:You are welcome to use this material under the stipulations of 'FAIR USE', but please cite the source. [2]
Not sure how much we can quote as "fair use". --Ed Poor 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --Peter Schmitt 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Far, far beyond Fair Use
I am appalled by this article. Evidently Meg Ireland brought it in 100% with no attempt to give it attribution or even make a *pass* at calling it "Fair Use". There is no indication anywhere in the article or on the Talk page that she herself did not write it in its entirety. As far as I'm concerned it's out and out plagiarism. Unless someone give me *very* strong counterarguments, I will be deleting it entirely. Hayford Peirce 00:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Literature Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Visual Arts Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Visual Arts Developing Articles
- Visual Arts Nonstub Articles
- Visual Arts Internal Articles