Talk:W. G. Grace: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Leach |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→CZ naming conventions: better to have more articles, no matter how they're titled!) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Hi Hayford. I've no problem with the convention and I'll use it in future. All part of the learning curve. :-) --[[User:John Leach|John Leach]] 03:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | :Hi Hayford. I've no problem with the convention and I'll use it in future. All part of the learning curve. :-) --[[User:John Leach|John Leach]] 03:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::This isn't actually engraved in stone, but it seems to be the consensus. Glad to see that we have new articles to talk about! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 05:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:00, 15 March 2010
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
| Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
CZ naming conventions
Hi, John, glad to see you being as industrious as 7 or 8 bees!
We do argue about this from time to time, but there is a general consensus (also spelled out somewhere in the guidelines) that for a name like this it is written, particularly in the article's title Initial dot no-space second initial dot space Last Name. Take a look, for instance, at P.G. Wodehouse, a fine Brit! (There are other examples, but I'll have to track them down if you want me to.) Hayford Peirce 03:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Hayford. I've no problem with the convention and I'll use it in future. All part of the learning curve. :-) --John Leach 03:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- This isn't actually engraved in stone, but it seems to be the consensus. Glad to see that we have new articles to talk about! Hayford Peirce 05:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)