Talk:Subculture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Tom Morris No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Seriously, the professional military as a subculture vis-a-vis civilians, and then the distinct subcultures within military forces, is a worthwhile area of comment. One of these days, I'll do more on the article on [[military sociology]]. There are pubs, for example, where one takes one's safety in hand if one is not a member of the Royal Marines, unless one is a U.S. Marine. An occasional exception may be made for Royal Navy personnel, who can have one drink and leave. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC) | Seriously, the professional military as a subculture vis-a-vis civilians, and then the distinct subcultures within military forces, is a worthwhile area of comment. One of these days, I'll do more on the article on [[military sociology]]. There are pubs, for example, where one takes one's safety in hand if one is not a member of the Royal Marines, unless one is a U.S. Marine. An occasional exception may be made for Royal Navy personnel, who can have one drink and leave. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, tough one that. Also seems like policing when it goes wrong has a separatist attitude to the general public. Not to mention academic ''town vs. gown'' attitudes. But is it a subculture? I'd say in the military case, there definitely is a specific set of things which might be like a subculture - but to say the military of a particular country ''is'' a subculture? I'm not sure I agree with that (although I haven't got first-hand experience, never having been in the military). It would be like saying the medical subculture or the political subculture or the subculture of lawyers - professions rarely seem to be talked about in terms of subcultures. Nor are mainstream religions really thought of as subcultures, although they undoubtedly fall into any definition of one. I think part of what makes a subculture is that it is essentially a ''new'' way of living that is somewhat non-mainstream or even anti-estbalishment - when people talk about "the Christian subculture", they aren't talking about Christianity, they are talking about some of the wacky stuff like ''Left Behind'' novels and "Jesus junk". Putting on torn jeans and going to a punk show is subculture, but putting on a dinner jacket and going to the Royal Albert Hall isn't. What defines that? Popularity? Establishment? It's hard to tell. The same thing that makes Christianity a religion and Scientology or David Koresh's lot a cult. | |||
:A brief Google for ''military subculture'' brings back people talking about military brats, and specific subcultures within the military - the "brutal subculture" (which, according to one newspaper editorial, is deemed to be responsible for stuff like Abu Ghraib), the evangelical Christian subculture, gay subculture within the military, military music as a subculture - but few hits that come back seem to think of the military itself as a subculture. But, as I said, I don't know much about military stuff. –[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 21:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:58, 8 June 2010
|
| Metadata here |
Not the crew of a submarine? If so, would the crew of a destroyer be a countersubculture?
Seriously, the professional military as a subculture vis-a-vis civilians, and then the distinct subcultures within military forces, is a worthwhile area of comment. One of these days, I'll do more on the article on military sociology. There are pubs, for example, where one takes one's safety in hand if one is not a member of the Royal Marines, unless one is a U.S. Marine. An occasional exception may be made for Royal Navy personnel, who can have one drink and leave. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, tough one that. Also seems like policing when it goes wrong has a separatist attitude to the general public. Not to mention academic town vs. gown attitudes. But is it a subculture? I'd say in the military case, there definitely is a specific set of things which might be like a subculture - but to say the military of a particular country is a subculture? I'm not sure I agree with that (although I haven't got first-hand experience, never having been in the military). It would be like saying the medical subculture or the political subculture or the subculture of lawyers - professions rarely seem to be talked about in terms of subcultures. Nor are mainstream religions really thought of as subcultures, although they undoubtedly fall into any definition of one. I think part of what makes a subculture is that it is essentially a new way of living that is somewhat non-mainstream or even anti-estbalishment - when people talk about "the Christian subculture", they aren't talking about Christianity, they are talking about some of the wacky stuff like Left Behind novels and "Jesus junk". Putting on torn jeans and going to a punk show is subculture, but putting on a dinner jacket and going to the Royal Albert Hall isn't. What defines that? Popularity? Establishment? It's hard to tell. The same thing that makes Christianity a religion and Scientology or David Koresh's lot a cult.
- A brief Google for military subculture brings back people talking about military brats, and specific subcultures within the military - the "brutal subculture" (which, according to one newspaper editorial, is deemed to be responsible for stuff like Abu Ghraib), the evangelical Christian subculture, gay subculture within the military, military music as a subculture - but few hits that come back seem to think of the military itself as a subculture. But, as I said, I don't know much about military stuff. –Tom Morris 21:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)