User talk:Roger A. Lohmann/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis (→Editor applications: new editors) |
imported>Roger A. Lohmann |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:Thanks Roger for looking into those editors, poor things were in purgatory for a long time! Is [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Vijayaraya that] really his name? I know there is a section of India (I think) that only uses one name. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 22:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | :Thanks Roger for looking into those editors, poor things were in purgatory for a long time! Is [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Vijayaraya that] really his name? I know there is a section of India (I think) that only uses one name. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 22:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
::So it seems! [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] 23:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:21, 9 September 2009
User bio is in User:Roger_Lohmann
follow-up to our conversation about culture area
It occurred to me just now that you might be interested in developing an inter-disciplinary approach to the article on ethnonyms as well. It was one of the first articles I worked on here, and I've hardly looked back since, but it would be a good candidate for attention from many different perspectives. --Joe Quick 15:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
final version for approval on folk saint
If you have a moment, please have a look at the most recent posts here. In order to include Shamira's copyedits in the approved article, the to-be-approved version number has to be updated in the metadata by the nominating editor. Thanks! --Joe Quick 15:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
U.S. Education History articles - merge needed
Currently, there are two articles on Citizendium concerned with this topic, to wit:
The former, written by myself, consists at the moment in an introductory section only. I wish this to be retained as it provides a general overview and perspective. However, the two artilces should be merged. Both are assigned to Workgroups "History" and "Education", though they differ as to which is the primary WG. I assigned "History" as the primary WG and I believe this to be correct.
My question is: which should be the title article and which the redirect? Your call. Let me know and I will do the merge which includes moving the references on the one article to the subpages.
(The merge is simple enough - just add my intro section to the other article or vice versa, and construct the subpages. However, you are a History WG editor, so you could overrule this, of course. In the absence of a redirect, I'm glad I did a thorough search for duplicate articles before setting to work in earnest on this subject.)
James F. Perry 16:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Approval question
Could you take a look at Seven Wonders of the Ancient World? Its not my best work but I do think it's ready for approval. I don't really see any way it could be improved except maybe formatting issues. But I'm open to suggestions.Drew R. Smith 09:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Grand Trunk Railway
Hello Roger, I just nominated this one for approval. Please look it over; you're the only other history editor who would be familiar with such things. Thanks! Russell D. Jones 20:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Re-approval Adams-Onís Treaty draft
Roger, since I'm the author of the Adams-Onís Treaty/Draft article, I can not nominate it for re-approval and need another history editor to nominate it. Would you please look it over and consider nominating the draft for approval? Thanks. Russell D. Jones 12:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
final touches on the Grand Trunk Railway
Russell updated the version of Grand Trunk Railway to be approved to the most recent revision and the article is just about ready to go, but we need you to have a look over those changes and let us know whether you also agree with them. Once we've heard from you and Milt, Hayford or Matt can make it official. Thanks much. --Joe (Approvals Manager) 12:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to be a bother but did you see the note I left above? I noticed that you've been on the wiki in the last couple of hours but didn't respond here or at the article talk page. --Joe Quick 02:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Kamehameha I
In my opinion, Kamehameha I is as close to being "complete" as it can be. I think I have covered all major aspects of his life. I am asking you four; Joe Quick (as approvals manager), Roger Lohmann (as a history and politics editor), Russell Jones (as a history editor), and Howard Berkowitz (as a military editor), to look over the article and suggest any changes you think neccessary. Between the five of us, I don't see why we can't get this article improved. Thanks for your time. Drew R. Smith 09:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
changes to Grand Trunk
Hi Roger, have you seen the comments on the talk page of Grand Trunk Railway? Milt and Russell are already on board for a quick re-approval. If you have a few minutes, could you stop by? Thanks much. --Joe (Approvals Manager) 13:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Editor applications
Hi Roger, any chances that you can take a look at the editor application queue, there seem to be some there that probably need some attention. Thanks, D. Matt Innis 00:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Roger for looking into those editors, poor things were in purgatory for a long time! Is that really his name? I know there is a section of India (I think) that only uses one name. D. Matt Innis 22:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- So it seems! Roger Lohmann 23:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)