Talk:Java concurrency package: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (starting some comments on the article) |
imported>Pat Palmer (grouse about directly attributed quotes used for definitions) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===what features are in Java 5.0 vs. Java 6.0=== | ===what features are in Java 5.0 vs. Java 6.0=== | ||
My understanding is that Java 6.0 introduced some new data synchronization constructs into the language. This article would benefit from stating clearly what came with Java 5.0, and then what was added in Java 6.0.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC) | My understanding is that Java 6.0 introduced some new data synchronization constructs into the language. This article would benefit from stating clearly what came with Java 5.0, and then what was added in Java 6.0.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
===Definitions all done by quotes=== | |||
Directly quoting another author for every definition of a term seems like overkill. Definitions should generally be paraphrased into one's own words. The only reason for placing a reference on the definition of a widely-known term is if the person or source being cited is being given credit for inventing the concept represented by the term. These "definition quotes" all need to be transformed. The references can be kept by placing a pointer to the reference on the Bibiography or External Links tabs.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 01:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:50, 16 August 2010
overall comments
This is a great beginning. The article as it stands today makes some excellent points. Some of the work which might still be done is detailed in the following subsections (to be added shortly):Pat Palmer 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
what features are in Java 5.0 vs. Java 6.0
My understanding is that Java 6.0 introduced some new data synchronization constructs into the language. This article would benefit from stating clearly what came with Java 5.0, and then what was added in Java 6.0.Pat Palmer 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Definitions all done by quotes
Directly quoting another author for every definition of a term seems like overkill. Definitions should generally be paraphrased into one's own words. The only reason for placing a reference on the definition of a widely-known term is if the person or source being cited is being given credit for inventing the concept represented by the term. These "definition quotes" all need to be transformed. The references can be kept by placing a pointer to the reference on the Bibiography or External Links tabs.Pat Palmer 01:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)