Talk:Standard argument against free will: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews (→Critique: new section) |
imported>William Meyer |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This article is written from a personal standpoint. I have emphasized the view that the moral and the physical realms are separate, and attempts to include all of subjective experience within the scientific enterprise, while laudable and successful to a degree, are arguably never going to succeed entirely. Consequently some bias appears in this article so far as I have written it, and little patience is given to long and convoluted semantic exercises that date back prior to Plato and continue until today with (in my opinion) next to no progress or illumination, simply repeating old conundrums in newer language. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 16:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC) | This article is written from a personal standpoint. I have emphasized the view that the moral and the physical realms are separate, and attempts to include all of subjective experience within the scientific enterprise, while laudable and successful to a degree, are arguably never going to succeed entirely. Consequently some bias appears in this article so far as I have written it, and little patience is given to long and convoluted semantic exercises that date back prior to Plato and continue until today with (in my opinion) next to no progress or illumination, simply repeating old conundrums in newer language. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 16:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Problems== | |||
Sloppy editing and proofreading detract heavily from the value of the article. "Casual" vs. "causal" is an error which leaps off the screen, yet the error is repeated. |
Revision as of 21:32, 23 November 2013
Critique
This article is written from a personal standpoint. I have emphasized the view that the moral and the physical realms are separate, and attempts to include all of subjective experience within the scientific enterprise, while laudable and successful to a degree, are arguably never going to succeed entirely. Consequently some bias appears in this article so far as I have written it, and little patience is given to long and convoluted semantic exercises that date back prior to Plato and continue until today with (in my opinion) next to no progress or illumination, simply repeating old conundrums in newer language. John R. Brews 16:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Problems
Sloppy editing and proofreading detract heavily from the value of the article. "Casual" vs. "causal" is an error which leaps off the screen, yet the error is repeated.
- Article with Definition
- Philosophy Category Check
- Physics Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles