Forum Talk:Content/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (→Article lists: new section) |
imported>Peter Jackson (→Rewriting the past: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Previously, different groups of people came up with separate lists in at least three different places, with a high degree of overlap. Transclusions allow the lists to be edited once and then reflected on all the pages on which they appear. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 18:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | Previously, different groups of people came up with separate lists in at least three different places, with a high degree of overlap. Transclusions allow the lists to be edited once and then reflected on all the pages on which they appear. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 18:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Rewriting the past == | |||
According to the Contact page the constabulary email is not yet back online, and it says to go straight to Forum, so here I am. | |||
This is about [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:Jess_Key&diff=prev&oldid=100849013]. | |||
#Is it permissible to change other people's posts? | |||
#The edit summary cites "legal reasons". If the relevant law indeed requires us to rewrite the past, should we move to another jurisdiction? | |||
[[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:21, 4 January 2016
| Help system | All recent posts | Back to top | Contact Administrators | Archives |
|
Content issues Discussion on all aspects of content and content policy, including inclusionism, audience, original research, neutrality and copyediting | ||||
Uncategorised pages list
The uncategorised pages list has been updated. There is an automatically-generated list, but it's flooded with subpages such as /Definition, because in most cases we add categories through templates rather than directly to the page. The 'pain-free' list strips out all the subpages and includes articles only. Without categories, they do not count to our overall total of articles (currently 16,467), and are effectively invisible because they don't show up on any category lists. They can be fixed by adding the {{subpages}} template at a minimum, and ideally by adding a Metadata page (which the template will prompt you to do). John Stephenson 16:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Article lists
If you check the workgroup home pages, e.g. for the Astronomy Workgroup, you will see that new lists of articles have been added (under 'Articles' and/or 'Core articles'). These are 'transcluded' (incorporated from another page) from two main sources: the lists from the defunct 'Core Articles' initiative, and the 'Subtopics' list from the Related Articles subpage for each group's main article.
Previously, different groups of people came up with separate lists in at least three different places, with a high degree of overlap. Transclusions allow the lists to be edited once and then reflected on all the pages on which they appear. John Stephenson 18:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Rewriting the past
According to the Contact page the constabulary email is not yet back online, and it says to go straight to Forum, so here I am.
This is about [1].
- Is it permissible to change other people's posts?
- The edit summary cites "legal reasons". If the relevant law indeed requires us to rewrite the past, should we move to another jurisdiction?
Peter Jackson (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)