Talk:Anabolism: Difference between revisions
imported>DavidGoodman (general discussion?) |
imported>Pedro Silva No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think I asked you this about cell metabolism, earlier. I think it would be most helpful to have a fuller discussion of the most important pathways, before the list of subtopics, and I do not know whether you intend doing so. If you are, i think you could do so more fluently than I could, and I could use the time best elsewhere on Cz. But if you don't want to do such sections, I will, because I consider them needed. so perhaps you could reply here with an outline of what would help rather than hinder. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 20:51, 2 November 2006 (CST) | I think I asked you this about cell metabolism, earlier. I think it would be most helpful to have a fuller discussion of the most important pathways, before the list of subtopics, and I do not know whether you intend doing so. If you are, i think you could do so more fluently than I could, and I could use the time best elsewhere on Cz. But if you don't want to do such sections, I will, because I consider them needed. so perhaps you could reply here with an outline of what would help rather than hinder. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 20:51, 2 November 2006 (CST) | ||
* I have made a fuller discussion in "Metabolism", like you suggested. Please tell me what you think of that one now.. | |||
I do not really know what to write in "anabolism" (or "catabolism") : I'm afraid that wuld make them too long :-( But feel free to try something (just one paragraph or so...) so that I will get a better idea of what you mean.. [[User:Pedro Silva|Pedro Silva]] 03:51, 3 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 04:51, 3 November 2006
I think I asked you this about cell metabolism, earlier. I think it would be most helpful to have a fuller discussion of the most important pathways, before the list of subtopics, and I do not know whether you intend doing so. If you are, i think you could do so more fluently than I could, and I could use the time best elsewhere on Cz. But if you don't want to do such sections, I will, because I consider them needed. so perhaps you could reply here with an outline of what would help rather than hinder. DavidGoodman 20:51, 2 November 2006 (CST)
- I have made a fuller discussion in "Metabolism", like you suggested. Please tell me what you think of that one now..
I do not really know what to write in "anabolism" (or "catabolism") : I'm afraid that wuld make them too long :-( But feel free to try something (just one paragraph or so...) so that I will get a better idea of what you mean.. Pedro Silva 03:51, 3 November 2006 (CST)