User talk:Supten Sarbadhikari: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati No edit summary |
imported>Michael Hardy |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Contraception (medical)== | ==Contraception (medical)== | ||
Supten, I have been the primary author of an article on the medical methods of contraception [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Contraception_%28medical_methods%29] It has just been nominated for approval by Gareth Leng. Could you kindly read it? As a physician, I encourage you to edit as needed. put your comments on the health page, if you support the nomination-please add your name to the template. If you believe that the article should not be approved, please remove the template for nomination. Obviously I hope that you support it, but I want to make it clear that you do have that option. Thanks, [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 06:04, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | Supten, I have been the primary author of an article on the medical methods of contraception [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Contraception_%28medical_methods%29] It has just been nominated for approval by Gareth Leng. Could you kindly read it? As a physician, I encourage you to edit as needed. put your comments on the health page, if you support the nomination-please add your name to the template. If you believe that the article should not be approved, please remove the template for nomination. Obviously I hope that you support it, but I want to make it clear that you do have that option. Thanks, [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 06:04, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== How long to get a simple typo fixed in the approved article? == | |||
Please look at the discussion at [[talk:contraception (medical methods)]] under the same heading that appears above this comment. A gross error such as this would not take months to fix on Wikipedia, but here it does. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 08:30, 16 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:30, 16 September 2007
Glad you're here. The more people who know biology the better. DavidGoodman 22:59, 5 November 2006 (CST)
Deleting articles...
Good to see that you're moving toward this. Is there any chance we can CZfy the template so it doesn't claim this is Wikipedia? Ori Redler 07:19, 26 January 2007 (CST)
Big Cleanup
Thanks for giving the Big Cleanup a try!
For purposes of adding workgroup categories, please stick to the workgroups that are listed at CZ:Discipline Workgroups. Also, use "Category:Needs Workgroup" (capitalization important) only if there are not any suitable workgroups for an article. If you think there needs to be another workgroup (which hasn't been created) in addition to one that you've placed an article into, then simply specify: cat_check = y ... And one last thing, please sign your name with four tildes, not three, so that the date you filled out the checklist is given. I'll add all this into the instructions. :-) --Larry Sanger 08:17, 9 March 2007 (CST)
Evidenced Based medicine
I can help here, and will be glad to. It's a good start to the article. Nancy Sculerati 06:55, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Contraception (medical)
Supten, I have been the primary author of an article on the medical methods of contraception [1] It has just been nominated for approval by Gareth Leng. Could you kindly read it? As a physician, I encourage you to edit as needed. put your comments on the health page, if you support the nomination-please add your name to the template. If you believe that the article should not be approved, please remove the template for nomination. Obviously I hope that you support it, but I want to make it clear that you do have that option. Thanks, Nancy Sculerati 06:04, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
How long to get a simple typo fixed in the approved article?
Please look at the discussion at talk:contraception (medical methods) under the same heading that appears above this comment. A gross error such as this would not take months to fix on Wikipedia, but here it does. Michael Hardy 08:30, 16 September 2007 (CDT)