John D. Altenburg: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[" to "") |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
'''John D. Altenburg jr''' (b. June 10, 1944) was | '''John D. Altenburg jr''' (b. June 10, 1944) was a [[United States of America|US]] [[United States Army|Army]] lawyer, who eventually rose to the rank of Major General.<ref name=AltenburgOfficialBio> | ||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
| url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/d20031230altenburg.pdf | | url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2003/d20031230altenburg.pdf | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenselink.mil%2Fnews%2FDec2003%2Fd20031230altenburg.pdf&date=2011-04-22 mirror] | }} [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenselink.mil%2Fnews%2FDec2003%2Fd20031230altenburg.pdf&date=2011-04-22 mirror] | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
His most senior post was Assistant Judge Advocate General. After his retirement he was chosen to be in charge of the " | His most senior post was Assistant Judge Advocate General. After his retirement, he was chosen to be in charge of the "military commissions" for trying selected individuals held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba. | ||
The nature of the military commissions has been controversial.<ref name=DailyPress2005-11-10> | The nature of the military commissions has been controversial.<ref name=DailyPress2005-11-10> |
Revision as of 03:47, 3 September 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
John D. Altenburg jr (b. June 10, 1944) was a US Army lawyer, who eventually rose to the rank of Major General.[1] His most senior post was Assistant Judge Advocate General. After his retirement, he was chosen to be in charge of the "military commissions" for trying selected individuals held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba. The nature of the military commissions has been controversial.[2] The Bush administration has argued that the suspects must be tried by these military commissions, rather than in a court of law, so that the classified evidence used against them can be kept secret. Commenting on Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention, which states that captives must have a "competent tribunal" convened if there is any doubt as to whether they are or aren't Prisoner of War|POWs Altenburg said:[2]
References
|