Talk:Mon (Japanese coin)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Workgroup category or categories | Economics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 12:16, 22 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Should this article, and the other ones on Japanese currency units, be combined into a single article, with sections for each, and a redirect from each individual one to the appropriate section? I ask this now because it is an example of what will be a very frequent occurrence, as a great many WP articles are written this way. I think the reader is better served by having them together--its simpler than following the hyperlinks. (This is perhaps the difference between an encyclopedia and an encyclopedic dictionary)DavidGoodman 19:59, 18 November 2006 (CST)
- Yes! By all means! This would also enhance the chance that the more encompassing article would be written by a person who understand this... All the mini-articles for various coins leave the impression of being studiously copied, not written by someone who actually understand this. This is especially important with ancient coinage, uniting aureus, denarius, solidus, etc. Ori Redler 01:43, 19 November 2006 (CST)
Categories:
- Economics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Economics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Economics External Articles
- Economics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Economics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup