Talk:Afghanistan War (2001-2021)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Thoughts on structure
I'd like to find a way to structure this so that the Phase I-III combat operations can be made an approvable article, while continuing to deal with the continuing security situation. Thoughts? Howard C. Berkowitz 22:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Is this right?
"the al-Qaeda senior leadership, who took responsibility for the attacks"
I don't remember any report to that effect at the time. Not until long after did we get a video of bin Laden claiming responsibility. On the contrary, the reason the Taliban were reported as giving for refusing to hand him over was that they'd been presented with no proof. Peter Jackson 09:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- I can't give you references from memory, although check the al-Qaeda article. They do exist. To some extent, the Taliban argument was based on pashtunwali. Alternatively, the Taliban did not effectively participate in diplomatic processes, were recognized by only three nations (one revoked after 9/11). There was much more evidence than videos, and, to start with, the 1998 declaration of war by A-Q.
- In any event, the 9/11 attack planning was done principally in Pakistan, not Afghanistan, admittedly in small cells. The leadership and training moved to Afghanistan for security, just as the Services Office had begun in Pakistan. Howard C. Berkowitz 13:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Military Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- History Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Military Developing Articles
- Military Nonstub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Military tag
- History tag
- United States Army tag