Talk:Tennis
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article focuses too much on early 20th century tennis and not enough (if at all) on later tennis players. --Charles Sandberg 20:48, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
Moving it along now...
In my reading, for what's its worth, this article is fantastic, approval worthy. Can we involve an editor here? Stephen Ewen 15:37, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- Well, if you think so, great! There are apparently some Sports Editors but, as far as I can tell, they have never contributed 50 cents worth of stuff to our efforts. Maybe they should be de-Editorized and some new ones found. If *this* article could be Approved, I might have the energy to spend some serious time with Pancho Gonzales and Bill Tilden, both of which have an enormous amount of material in them, but mostly in the ghastly WP format, which, however, I have revised to a certain degree. If these articles could be revised to any useful purpose, and then approved, I'll be happy to do it. If they're just going to languish, however.... Hayford Peirce 00:57, 24 October 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Sports Developed Articles
- Sports Advanced Articles
- Sports Nonstub Articles
- Sports Internal Articles
- Hobbies Developed Articles
- Hobbies Advanced Articles
- Hobbies Nonstub Articles
- Hobbies Internal Articles
- Hobbies tag
- Tennis tag