Talk:World War II, air war, Allied offensive counter-air campaign
Reason for not using subpages
Chris, you can see that here, as well as Vietnam War, a good deal of my focus was to break an unmanageably long article into sub-articles that both flowed better and lent themselves to more detailed fact-checking. By and large, I regarded the subarticle titles largely as placeholders, given some of the objections to Jensen's comma style. It had been my hope that a naming consensus might emerge and the metadata could go in for a more generally accepted title structure.
Unfortunately, a consensus on structure has not merged. Some of these titles are ugly, ugly, ugly. I still have mixed feelings; it does help to have the Related Articles page, but "definition" is quite difficult when still struggling with the division of huge-content into subarticles.
Thoughts?
Howard C. Berkowitz 18:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)