Talk:Set (mathematics)

From Citizendium
Revision as of 11:06, 28 July 2008 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→‎Paradoxes, ordered sets: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Informally, any collection of distinct elements. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Paradoxes, ordered sets

In the beginning, a set is described in an axiomatic way, without a rigorous definition. Have you thought about text that avoids Russell's Paradox? http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell-paradox/

I came to the article because I wanted to link to "ordered set". Is that one of the special sets here, should there be a section for it, or should there be a new article? For that matter, should this refer to or define tuples?

Howard C. Berkowitz 11:06, 28 July 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Set_(mathematics)&oldid=200850"