Fuzzy subalgebra

In fuzzy logic given a first order language we can interpret it by a fuzzy interpretation, i.e. a pair (D,I) such that D is a nonempty set and I, the interpretation function is a map associating any n-ary functor with an n-ary operation (as in the classical case) and any n-ary predicate name with a suitable n-ary fuzzy relation in D. The fuzzy subalgebras are particular fuzzy interpretations of a first order language for algebraic structures with a monadic predicate symbol S. More precisely, a fuzzy subalgebra, is a model of a theory containing, for any n-ary operation name h, the axiom

A1 ∀x₁..., ∀x_n(S(x₁)∧.....∧ S(x_n) → S(h(x₁,...,x_n))

and, for any constant c, the axiom

A2 S(c).

A1 expresses the closure of S with respect to the operation h, A2 expresses the fact that c is an element in S. As an example, assume that the valuation structure is defined in [0,1] and denote by $\odot$ the operation in [0,1] used to interpret the conjunction. Then it is easy to see that a fuzzy subalgebra of an algebraic structure whose domain is D is defined by a fuzzy subset s : D → [0,1] of D such that, for every d₁,...,d_n in D, if h is the interpretation of the n-ary operation symbol h, then

i) s(d₁)$\odot ...\odot$s(d_n)≤ s(h(d₁,...,d_n))

Moreover, if c is the interpretation of a constant c

ii) s(c) = 1.

A largely studied class of fuzzy subalgebras is the one in which the operation $\odot$ coincides with the minimum. In such a case it is immediate to prove the following proposition.

Proposition. A fuzzy subset s of an algebraic structure defines a fuzzy subalgebra if and only if for every λ in [0,1], the closed cut {x $\in$ D : s(x)≥ λ} of s is a subalgebra.

The fuzzy subgroups and the fuzzy submonoids are particularly interesting classes of fuzzy subalgebras. In such a case a fuzzy subset s of a monoid (M,•,u) is a fuzzy submonoid if and only if

    1)     s(u) =1
    2)     s(x)$\odot$s(y) ≤ s(x•y)

where u is the neutral element in A. Given a group G, a fuzzy subgroup of G is a fuzzy submonoid s of G such that

    3)     s(x) ≤ s(x-1).

It is possible to prove that the notion of fuzzy subgroup is strictly related with the notions of fuzzy equivalence. In fact, assume that S is a set, G a group of transformations in S and (G,s) a fuzzy subgroup of G. Then, by setting

 e(x,y) = Sup{s(h) : h is an element in G such that h(x) = y} 

we obtain a fuzzy equivalence. Conversely, let e be a fuzzy equivalence in S and, for every transformation h of S, set

 s(h)= Inf{e(x,h(x)): x$\in$S}. 

Then s defines a fuzzy subgroup of transformation in S. In a similar way we can relate the fuzzy submonoids with the fuzzy orders.

Bibliography

• Klir, G. and Bo Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic (1995) ISBN 978-0-13-101171-7
• Zimmermann H., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications (2001), ISBN 978-0-7923-7435-0.
• Chakraborty H. and Das S., On fuzzy equivalence 1, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11 (1983), 185-193.
• Demirci M., Recasens J., Fuzzy groups, fuzzy functions and fuzzy equivalence relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 144 (2004), 441-458.
• Di Nola A., Gerla G., Lattice valued algebras, Stochastica, 11 (1987), 137-150.
• Hájek P., Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer 1998.
• Klir G. , UTE H. St.Clair and Bo Yuan Fuzzy Set Theory Foundations and Applications,1997.
• Gerla G., Scarpati M., Similarities, Fuzzy Groups: a Galois Connection, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 292 (2004), 33-48.
• Mordeson J., Kiran R. Bhutani and Azriel Rosenfeld. Fuzzy Group Theory, Springer Series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 182, 2005.
• Rosenfeld A., Fuzzy groups, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 35 (1971), 512-517.
• Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy Sets, ‘’Information and Control’’, 8 (1965) 338­353.
• Zadeh L.A., Similarity relations and fuzzy ordering, Inform. Sci. 3 (1971) 177–200.