Talk:Electronic Data Interchange

From Citizendium
Revision as of 13:15, 16 August 2008 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→‎Issue of definition: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


Issue of definition

Yes, some ANSI formats are obsolete. I would argue, however, that EDI still has strong presence not as a variety of standards — which were never terribly uniform — but as a viable model for transaction-oriented electronic commerce (e.g., funds transfer, airline reservations) and domain-specific information exchange (e.g., HL7 and the separately developed DICOM in medicine). Howard C. Berkowitz 14:15, 16 August 2008 (CDT)