Hamdi v. Rumsfeld/Definition

From Citizendium
< Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Revision as of 22:17, 3 March 2009 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: <noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude> A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms a...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A definition or brief description of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.

A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms against the United States, still was entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if he was an enemy combatant subject to military, rather than civilian, law