Talk:Social democracy

From Citizendium
Revision as of 14:06, 24 April 2010 by imported>Tom Morris
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A political movement which seeks to attain community control of the distribution of wealth through democratic means. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Economics, Politics and Sociology [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

I tend to disagree with this definition, which is quite applicable for economic socialism. Social democracy, however, can exist in a significantly capitalist economy and have no deliberate intent of wealth redistribution. Otto von Bismarck used the term more to suggest that a workforce that received adequate social services was more productive, even if the means of production was in capitalist hands.

The distinction between social democracy and economic socialism is rarely made in popular U.S. politics, but I believe it to be a critical one. --Howard C. Berkowitz 20:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Simple rule of thumb: if you could take an American and move them to country C and they would find it intolerably distributive of wealth, it is socialism. Otherwise it is social democracy. I kid, of course! –Tom Morris 20:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Social_democracy&oldid=738057"