CZ:Biology Workgroup: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
Line 459: | Line 459: | ||
===Naming convention=== | ===Naming convention=== | ||
To be decided. Online poll is [http://www.doodle.ch/participation.html?pollId=vyb92ak9gguddpvk here]. Also look at the proposal from Noel of separating pagenames and article names. See the forum thread [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1654.msg15982.html#msg15982 here] for more details (read the whole thread for context). | To be decided. Online poll is [http://www.doodle.ch/participation.html?pollId=vyb92ak9gguddpvk here]. Also look at the proposal from Noel of separating pagenames (i.e. location) and article names (i.e. title). See the forum thread [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1654.msg15982.html#msg15982 here] for more details (read the whole thread for context). | ||
'''Options:''' | '''Options:''' |
Revision as of 10:50, 9 June 2008
|
Biology Week! |
Go here and sign up to help plan our big "open house" for biologists!
|
How you can help |
Launch workgroup tagging of articles
Any article related to the Biology Workgroup should be placed in the category [[Category:Biology Workgroup]]". This means that we think the biology workgroup will be one of the main groups to manage this article. Note, the tag is *not* "[[Category:Biology]]"; that's because we're attaching the article to its *management*. Note: only articles with the biology workgroup category tag will been seen in the recent changes for all biology articles (see header above). Launch area management: deferred We should probably defer selection of discipline workgroup management until after more people in each area have arrived, and we have had a chance to finalize how this management will be selected. |
Proposed subgroups |
The organisation we inherited from Wikipedia is subdivided into disciplines within biology, however, we do not have to follow such a format. We can move forward with subgroups that seem more natural, and I imagine some subgroups will include several related disciplines. We can discuss this more on the subgroups thread, in the biology forum, as we reach a critical mass of editors and authors. Relevant lists and headers from Wikipedia are shown at the bottom of this section. Also, the list of high priority articles in the next section are currently categorized by discipline. |
High priority articles
This list of articles is not complete but it can be used as a starting point for writing new articles or focus our efforts towards getting more articles approved. Articles in bold are regarded as a higher priority. Those struck through are considered as low priority.
Biography
- Biography
- Charles Darwin
- Francis Crick
- J. B. S. Haldane
- Robert Hooke
- Bernard Katz
- Carolus Linnaeus
- Konrad Lorenz
- Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
- Ernst Mayr
- Barbara McClintock
- Gregor Mendel
- Alfred Russel Wallace
- James D. Watson
- E. O. Wilson
Anatomy
- Anatomy
- Histology
- Circulatory system
- Endocrine system
- Gastrointestinal tract
- Integumentary system
- Nervous system
- Sensory system
- Reproductive system
- Respiratory system
- Skeleton
Biochemistry
Biophysics
- Biophysics
- Biofilms
- Biomechanics
- Biomineralisation
- Bionics
- Biophysical techniques
- Cell
- Cryoptobiology
- Homeostasis
- Locomotion
- Radiobiology
- Signal transduction
- Systems biology
- Theoretical biology
- Thermodynamics
Botany
- Botany
- Fungus
- Plant
- Plant anatomy
- Leaf
- Flower
- Root
- Stem
- Plant tissues
parenchymacollenchymasclerenchymaepidermisguard cell- stomate (plural: stomata)
trichomeroot hair
- xylem article could merge together the subcategories
- phloem article could merge together the subcategories
- Plant physiology
- Plant behavior
Cell biology
- Cell biology
- Cell
- Cell division
- Cell nucleus
- Cell wall
- Cell membrane
- Cell metabolism
- Cytoplasm
- Cytoskeleton
- Flagellum
- Organelles
Developmental biology
Ecology
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Population
- Metapopulation
- Community (ecology)
- Ecosystem
- Landscape
- Biome
- Species
- Biodiversity
- Biogeography
- Biological dispersal
- Ecological succession
- Symbiosis
- Food web
Evolutionary biology
Genetics
- Genetics
- Classical genetics
- Clinical genetics
- Ecological genetics
- Molecular genetics
- Population genetics
- Quantitative genetics
Microbiology
Molecular biology
- Molecular biology
- Polymerase chain reaction
- Gel electrophoresis
- Southern blot
- Northern blot
- Restriction enzyme
- Western blot
Neuroscience
- Neuroscience
- Behaviour
- Brain
- Spinal cord
- Intelligence
- Nervous system
- Neuron
- Neural development
- Neuroanatomy
- Neurochemistry
- Synapse
Physiology
Taxonomy
Virology
Zoology
Core article
The list below is adapted from the high priority articles above and the small list that has already started at CZ:Core_Articles#Biology. These are articles that we deem vital to get the biology section going. Please add and delete from this list. We are restricted to 198 articles that we think are needed now.
For a more comprehensive list search for the red links in the CZ:Biology_Workgroup/list or CZ:Biology_Workgroup/concepts.
Just to clarify, I combined the list the concepts and the core article we already had. I then edited for duplicates and removed items that did not seem to fit the core concept. We now have 300 articles. Feel free to add topics that are missing. Also feel free to group articles into topic related concepts, although this alphabetical list is probably OK for those wanting to see what is missing from CZ. Chris Day (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
Lower priority
Biographies
We may already have some of these under different spellings or without the middle name.
Organisms
Already have these
Move these to the first column if they need a lot of work.
Bear in mind the Health Sciences Workgroup has 198, too, and there must not be overlap. --Larry Sanger 12:02, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
- Also note that the red links on the "already have" list are articles that are marked as externally sourced. These may be included at CZ:Core Articles to be rewritten.--Joe Quick (Talk) 18:53, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
Tree-of-life subgroup
A major part of the articles in the biology workgroup can be categorized under the concept of Tree of Life. All article about a species, genus or any other taxonomic level are part of this subgroup.
Naming convention
To be decided. Online poll is here. Also look at the proposal from Noel of separating pagenames (i.e. location) and article names (i.e. title). See the forum thread here for more details (read the whole thread for context).
Options:
1. Only common name: "Giant Panda"
- Example: The giant panda (Scientific name Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a species of bear...
- Pros: May be more user friendly, as most users are unfamiliar with the scientific name.
- Cons: Lacks consistency, as there are no common names for some organisms. Also, if a bot is eventually used to fill out taxoboxes, it requires that the scientific name always redirect to the common name, which may not always be the case.
2. Only scientific name: "Ailuropoda melanoleuca"
- Example: Ailuropoda melanoleuca, commonly known as the giant panda, is a species of bear...
- Pros: More suited to bot farming of taxonomy. Avoids confusion where a common name doesn't exactly line up with a taxonomic division.
- Cons: Less user friendly – would require redirects from the common name, as few users know the scientific name.
3. Both names, scientific one in parentheses: "Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)"
- Example: The Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a species of bear...
- Pros: Includes all information in title. This presentation of the information is fairly standard, so it is likely that users will recognize that the information in parentheses is the scientific name.
- Cons: Name is long. Poorly suited to bot farming of taxonomy. Also, the page will have to be moved if the common name OR the scientific name is changed.
4. Both names, common one in parentheses: "Ailuropoda melanoleuca (Giant Panda)"
- Example: Ailuropoda melanoleuca (giant panda) is a species of bear...
- Pros: Includes all information in title.
- Cons: Name is long. Poorly suited to bot farming of taxonomy. Also, the page will have to be moved if the common name OR the scientific name is changed.
Taxoboxes
Taxoboxes facilitate the navigation through the Tree-of-Life and each taxon is required to have one using the Template:Taxobox.
Major topics from wikipedia biology portal
Tools
- To wikify scientific references (via Google Scholar). Sample search for "biology next mathematics"
- To find related articles (in Pubmed). Sample search (based on the first paragraph of Life). The site is slow, though, and thus perhaps only of good use if you are looking for references outside your primary field of expertise.
- To find Open Access biomedical images. Sample search for "amygdala"